Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Changes in Religious Affiliation, Understanding Religious Unaffiliation

A new poll by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public life provides an analysis behind our changes in religious affiliation and the meaning of increased numbers of religiously unaffiliated. Methodologically speaking, this poll surveyed 2800 Americans, an in-depth follow-up to a poll completed last year. Money quote:
Americans change religious affiliation early and often. In total, about half of American adults have changed religious affiliation at least once during their lives. ... The survey documents the fluidity of religious affiliation in the U.S. and describes in detail the patterns and reasons for change.

The reasons people give for changing their religion - or leaving religion altogether - differ widely depending on the origin and destination of the convert. The group that has grown the most in recent years due to religious change is the unaffiliated population. ... Additionally, many people who left a religion to become unaffiliated say they did so in part because they think of religious people as hypocritical or judgmental, because religious organizations focus too much on rules or because religious leaders are too focused on power and money. Far fewer say they became unaffiliated because they believe that modern science proves that religion is just superstition.

The (frequent) movement between religious affiliations does not suprise me, because of our lack of denominational identification and denominational loyalty. But, I was surprised to read some of the analysis behind religious unaffiliation, in light of the increasing numbers nationwide. While this unaffiliation is an indictement of organized religion, those religiously unaffiliated are "surprisingly open" to religion; their current dissatisfaction with religion does not necessarily preclude interest to religiously re-affiliate. So, to me, its not that the unaffiliated are necessarily espousing athiestic principles, its that they are both rebelling against the flaws of organized religion and simultaneously seeking a good spiritual fit.

2 comments:

matt said...

"its not that the unaffiliated are necessarily espousing athiestic principles, its that they are both rebelling against the flaws of organized religion and simultaneously seeking a good spiritual fit."

drew - in all seriousness, i think you are right, and i'd love to hear why you think that is. as we have talked about here before, this line of thinking is nothing new, yet it is growing in recent times. why? organized religion, if anything, has become less fundamental in the last 30 years. so why now the flight away from it? what is different about our times?

Darren Staley said...

Matt,

I agree with you and with Drew's assessment. Speaking for myself, I think you have to equally blame the fundamentalists' marriage to Republican politics and the 24 hour news cycle.

Politics is always news. News is now always on. This makes fundamentalism seem more prevelant than it really is.

But peoples of a certain faith are loathe to call out their bretheren, Islam, to Judaism, to Christianity.

I think the reason why is that the faithful have a kind of unsaid reverence for those who seem more pious in their belief.

On a non-theological level, this is why the "working man" is held in a higher regard than the "pencil pusher," why the soldier is on a higher pedestal than the citizen.

Maybe I am going around my elbow to get to my ..., but I hope I am making my point clearly. To put it more simply, everyone tries to keep up with the Jones's. When we can't, we tend to resent them while also secretly revering them.